Skip to main content
Meet us at Black Hat USA 2026— Las Vegas, August 1–6Book a Meeting
Mallory
Back to malware
MalwareRansomwareUsed by 29 actorsExploits 3 CVEs

Brute Ratel C4

Also known asbrc4Brute Ratel

Brute Ratel C4 (also referred to as Brute Ratel, BRC4, or BRc4) is a commercial post-exploitation and command-and-control framework originally positioned as an attack simulation or red-team tool but widely adopted by threat actors. The content describes it as a customized attack simulation tool designed to evade common defensive controls and notes that its implants can take multiple forms, including executables, service binaries, DLLs, and PowerShell scripts.

Documented capabilities in the provided content include account and domain discovery using LDAP queries, net group "Domain Admins" /domain, and net user /domain; lateral movement via WMI and SMB; port scanning and broader network/service discovery; privilege escalation; process creation and injection for defense evasion; and the ability to hide memory artifacts and patch ETW and AMSI. The framework is also referenced in infrastructure-hunting research focused on identifying Brute Ratel C4 command-and-control infrastructure using sources such as JARM and HTTP response characteristics.

The content links Brute Ratel C4 to multiple intrusion chains and actor ecosystems. It states that Qakbot/QBot infections were observed leading to Brute Ratel in 2022, and that Arechclient2 reportedly delivered Cobalt Strike and Brute Ratel as a precursor to BlackSuit ransomware deployment in May 2024. Proofpoint identified a 20 September 2024 ClickFix campaign using HTML attachments and user-executed PowerShell to deliver Brute Ratel C4, which then led to Latrodectus. CERT Polska and Poland’s Military Counterintelligence Service reported an espionage campaign linked to Russian intelligence services, overlapping with APT29/NOBELIUM tradecraft, in which manually verified victims received Cobalt Strike or Brute Ratel after delivery through spear-phishing, compromised websites, HTML smuggling, ISO/IMG images, LNK execution, and DLL sideloading. Microsoft also observed DEV-0506 adding Brute Ratel in late September 2022 to support hands-on-keyboard access, and the content cites APT29 and APT41 among actors discussed in relation to techniques or broader use of such tooling.

Observed infection and execution vectors in the content include users opening malicious documents or attachments, phishing-delivered HTML attachments, ClickFix or fake CAPTCHA-style social engineering that tricks users into pasting PowerShell into the Run dialog, and delivery as a follow-on payload from malware such as Qakbot and Arechclient2. The content also places Brute Ratel among emerging alternatives to heavily detected frameworks such as Cobalt Strike, alongside Sliver and Mythic, as threat actors shift toward other dual-use red-team tools to reduce detection.

Share:
For your environment

Hunt this family in your stack

Mallory pivots from this family to the IOCs, detections, and named campaigns that touch your stack, and pages you when something new lands.

EXPLOITED CVES

Vulnerabilities exploited

3 CVEs Mallory has correlated with this family across public research and vendor advisories. Each row links to the full Mallory page for that vulnerability.

3 CVES
CVE-2025-42999Insecure Deserialization in SAP NetWeaver Visual Composer Metadata Uploader

The infection occurred within hours after the mass exploitation of webshells deployed on compromised NetWeaver instances started and involved the use of the Brute Ratel C2 framework.

via security weeksecurityweek.com
CVE-2025-31324Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload in SAP NetWeaver Visual Composer Metadata Uploader

The infection occurred within hours after the mass exploitation of webshells deployed on compromised NetWeaver instances started and involved the use of the Brute Ratel C2 framework.

via security weeksecurityweek.com
CVE-2025-29824Windows Common Log File System Driver Use-After-Free Privilege Escalation

... a subsequent attack involved the deployment of the Brute Ratel C2 framework using inline MSBuild task execution.

via the hacker newsthehackernews.com
THREAT ACTORS

Groups observed using it

29 distinct threat actors attributed by public researchers. Open in Mallory to see the full evidence chain and overlapping campaigns.

View more details
TA578

On 20 September 2024, Proofpoint researchers identified a campaign delivering Brute Ratel C4 and Latrodectus.

via proofpointproofpoint.com
TA571

On 20 September 2024, Proofpoint researchers identified a campaign delivering Brute Ratel C4 and Latrodectus.

via proofpointproofpoint.com
DEV-0506

In late September 2022, Microsoft observed DEV-0506 adding Brute Ratel as a tool to facilitate their hands-on-keyboard access as well as Cobalt Strike Beacons.

via microsoft generalmicrosoft.com
APT29

Currently, there are many APT groups and cybercrime gangs using this technique. Some examples include: APT41 Group, Aquatic Panda, APT29 using Brute Ratel C4...

via zerosalariumzerosalarium.com
Lunar Spider

Victims searching tax-related content are redirected to download malicious JavaScript files like Document-16-32-50.js. These scripts retrieve an MSI installer, which deploys Brute Ratel C4 (BRc4) by disguising the payload as legitimate software (vierm_soft_x64.dll under rundll32 execution).

via contagiodump blogcontagiodump.blogspot.com
APT41

Insikt Group observed a late 2022 RedHotel campaign which employed a stolen code signing certificate ... to load the offensive security tool (OST) Brute Ratel C4.

via recorded future bloggo.recordedfuture.com
MITRE ATT&CK

Techniques & procedures

29 distinct techniques documented for this family, organized by ATT&CK tactic.

Initial Access

3 techniques
T1190Exploit Public-Facing ApplicationEvidence1

Brute Ratel, a 'Cobalt-like' alternative toolkit for red-team pen testing, has been deployed by cybercriminal gangs, including the now-defunct Russian-speaking BlackCat threat actor, also known as AlphV, to launch healthcare sector attacks.

T1566PhishingEvidence1

The ClickFix technique is used by multiple different threat actors and can originate via compromised websites, documents, HTML attachments, malicious URLs, etc.

T1566.001Spearphishing AttachmentEvidence2

Tax and IRS-themed phishing emails delivering malicious PDF attachments leading to URL redirects and script downloads

Execution

6 techniques
T1047Windows Management InstrumentationEvidence1

The content repeatedly describes threat actors and malware using WMI/WMIC/wmiexec for remote execution, lateral movement, discovery, persistence, and administrative actions; e.g., 'APT41 used WMI in several ways, including for execution of commands via WMIEXEC as well as for persistence via PowerSploit' and 'Scattered Spider used Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) to move laterally via Impacket.'

T1059.001PowerShellEvidence1

This dialog box includes instructions that appear to describe how to “fix” the problem, but will either: automatically copy and paste a malicious script into the PowerShell terminal, or the Windows Run dialog box, to eventually run a malicious script via PowerShell.

T1059.003Windows Command ShellEvidence2

During the 2016 Ukraine Electric Power Attack, Sandworm Team used the xp_cmdshell command in MS-SQL. During the 2025 Poland Wiper Attacks, the adversaries leveraged PsExec to run cmd.exe commands on multiple victim machines. Numerous malware families and groups are described as using cmd.exe, cmd /c, Windows command shell, or command-line interfaces to execute commands, payloads, reconnaissance, persistence, cleanup, and ransomware actions.

T1204User ExecutionEvidence3

The inclusion of the “Browser check identificate:” prompt and a subsequent change made to the RunMRU registry key indicates this likely uses a paste-and-run fake CAPTCHA lure for initial execution.

T1204.002Malicious FileEvidence4

Sandworm Team leveraged Microsoft Office attachments which contained malicious macros that were automatically executed once the user permitted them... APT29 has used various forms of spearphishing attempting to get a user to open attachments... DarkGate is distributed through phishing links to VBS or MSI objects requiring user interaction for execution.

T1574.001DLLEvidence1

Have you ever heard of the DLL-Hijacking attack method? This type of attack exploits the search order and loading sequence of DLLs in Windows, causing your legitimate programs to load malicious code into memory.

Privilege Escalation

1 technique
T1055Process InjectionEvidence1

Brute Ratel is a commercial post-exploitation framework... capable of... creating processes to inject itself into for defense evasion.

Stealth

6 techniques
T1027Obfuscated Files or InformationEvidence2

The sample observed in this campaign attempted to evade analysts by reversing strings in the HTML body of the webpage.

T1036MasqueradingEvidence1

During the 2016 Ukraine Electric Power Attack, DLLs and EXEs with filenames associated with common electric power sector protocols were used to masquerade files.

T1036.005Match Legitimate Resource Name or LocationEvidence1

Akira has used legitimate names and locations for files to evade defenses.

T1055Process InjectionEvidence1

Brute Ratel is a commercial post-exploitation framework... capable of... creating processes to inject itself into for defense evasion.

T1140Deobfuscate/Decode Files or InformationEvidence2

The content repeatedly describes malware and threat actors decoding, decrypting, deobfuscating, or unpacking payloads, strings, configuration data, commands, and C2 responses prior to execution or use.

T1574.001DLLEvidence1

Have you ever heard of the DLL-Hijacking attack method? This type of attack exploits the search order and loading sequence of DLLs in Windows, causing your legitimate programs to load malicious code into memory.

Discovery

6 techniques
T1018Remote System DiscoveryEvidence1

BoomBox has the ability to execute an LDAP query to enumerate the distinguished name, SAM account name, and display name for all domain users. IceApple Active Directory Querier module can perform authenticated requests against an Active Directory server. Sandworm Team has used a tool to query Active Directory using LDAP.

T1046Network Service DiscoveryEvidence1

The content repeatedly describes threat actors and malware performing network scanning, port scanning, service enumeration, OS fingerprinting, and identifying open ports/services across victim environments.

T1057Process DiscoveryEvidence1

The content repeatedly describes malware and threat actors obtaining lists of running processes, using utilities such as tasklist, ps, WMI, Get-Process, CreateToolhelp32Snapshot, EnumProcesses, and similar APIs/commands to enumerate active processes on victim systems.

T1069.002Domain GroupsEvidence1

Brute Ratel C4 can use LDAP queries, net group "Domain Admins" /domain and net user /domain for discovery. OilRig has run net group "domain admins" /domain and net group "Exchange Trusted Subsystem" /domain to get account listings on a victim. Wizard Spider has identified domain admins through the use of net group "Domain admins" /DOMAIN.

T1087.002Domain AccountEvidence1

AdFind can enumerate domain users. APT41 used built-in net commands to enumerate domain administrator users. BloodHound can collect information about domain users, including identification of domain admin accounts.

T1580Cloud Infrastructure DiscoveryEvidence1

In this blog, I will explain my hunting methodology with two practical examples... this methodology (JARM and HTTP Response hash) is applicable to both examples and provides great results.

Lateral Movement

3 techniques
T1021.002SMB/Windows Admin SharesEvidence1

Brute Ratel is a commercial post-exploitation framework with implants that can take many forms, including executables, service binaries, DLLs, and PowerShell scripts. It is capable of moving laterally via Server Message Block (SMB)...

T1021.003Distributed Component Object ModelEvidence1

Examples include 'Aquatic Panda used WMI for lateral movement in victim environments,' 'Deep Panda group is known to utilize WMI for lateral movement,' and 'Cinnamon Tempest has used Impacket for lateral movement via WMI.'

T1570Lateral Tool TransferEvidence1

After Qakbot has all the information and sends it to the C2 server, the infection leads to Cobalt Strike or Brute Ratel.

Command and Control

4 techniques
T1071Application Layer ProtocolEvidence7

Hunting C2/Adversaries Infrastructure with Shodan and Censys ... My research Cobalt Strike C2 Metasploit/MSF Covenant C2 Deimos C2 Posh C2 Brute Ratel C4 Mythic C2 Sliver C2 ... Night Hawk C2 NimPlant C2 ShadowPad C2 Infrastructure Async Rat C2 Infrastructure Meterpreter C2 Infrastructure

T1071.001Web ProtocolsEvidence3

The content repeatedly describes threat actors and malware using HTTP and HTTPS for command and control, such as: "Sandworm Team used BlackEnergy to communicate between compromised hosts and their command-and-control servers via HTTP post requests."

T1105Ingress Tool TransferEvidence3

If the user performed the requested steps, PowerShell code was executed to download an executable that led to the installation of Lumma Stealer.

T1219Remote Access ToolsEvidence2

Cobalt Strike uses a command-line interface to interact with systems. Brute Ratel C4 can use cmd.exe for execution. Havoc can execute commands via cmd.exe. Covenant provides access to a Command Shell in Windows environments for follow-on command execution and tasking.

Exfiltration

1 technique
T1041Exfiltration Over C2 ChannelEvidence2

Many entries state malware or actors can upload, transfer, send, or exfiltrate files from compromised hosts to command-and-control servers or attacker infrastructure.

Other

1 technique
T1562.001Disable or Modify ToolsEvidence1

The developer behind BRc4... strives to make the tool harder to detect by specifically targeting the way EDRs work to avoid detection.

INDICATORS OF COMPROMISE

IOCs tracked for this family

32 indicators attributed across vendor reports, sandbox runs, and researcher write-ups. Full values are available in Mallory.

View more in app
Network
14 tracked

IPs, domains, and DNS infrastructure linked to this family.

Hashes
16 tracked

File hashes (MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256) from samples and reports.

Other
2 tracked

Other indicator types observed in public reporting.

TypeValueLatest sighting
hash.sha256●●●●●●●●●●●●View more in app1 month ago
ip.v4●●●●●●●●●●●●View more in app3 months ago
hash.sha256●●●●●●●●●●●●View more in app3 months ago
hash.md5●●●●●●●●●●●●View more in app3 months ago
hash.sha256●●●●●●●●●●●●View more in app3 months ago
hash.sha256●●●●●●●●●●●●View more in app3 months ago
What this page doesn’t show

The version that knows your environment.

This page is what’s public. Mallory adds the parts that aren’t: which of your assets match these IOCs, which detections are missing, which campaigns to expect next, and what to do in the next 30 minutes.
IOC matching32

Match every observed IP, domain, and hash against your live telemetry.

Threat actor attribution29

Named campaigns wielding this family, with evidence pinned to each claim.

Exploited vulnerabilities3

CVEs this family uses for access and lateral movement.

Detection signatures

YARA, Sigma, Snort, and vendor rules, auto-deployed to your SIEM.

MITRE ATT&CK mapping29

Every documented technique, ranked by evidence weight.

Researcher chatter

Reddit, Mastodon, and CTI community discussion around this family.