Skip to main content
Meet us at Black Hat USA 2026— Las Vegas, August 1–6Book a Meeting
Mallory
EspionageChina33 malware familiesExploits CVEs in the wild

Salt Typhoon

Also known asEarth EstriesFamousSparrowGhostEmperorOPERATOR PANDARed MikeREDMIKESalt Typhoonunc2286UNC5807

GhostEmperor is referenced with aliases including Earth Estries, FamousSparrow, Operator Panda, RedMike/Red Mike, Salt Typhoon, UNC2286, and UNC5807. Based on the provided content, the most widely recognized current name is Salt Typhoon. The content describes Salt Typhoon as a PRC-linked, China-aligned threat group involved in cyber espionage and persistent access operations, including maintaining long-term access inside major U.S. telecommunications providers in 2024. The group is discussed in the context of Chinese state-sponsored activity and broader Chinese contractor-enabled cyber operations. The reporting associates Salt Typhoon with telecommunications targeting and strategic intelligence collection. The content states that the group operated infrastructure useful for Harvest Now, Decrypt Later collection at scale, and that U.S. regulators cited Salt Typhoon-type incidents when tightening telecom and submarine cable security rules. Additional reporting says U.S. and partner governments attributed Salt Typhoon activity to at least three China-based private firms, and the UK NCSC stated that private firms enabled the activity, though specific tasking relationships and roles remained largely undescribed publicly as of mid-2025. Tradecraft directly associated with Salt Typhoon in the content centers heavily on Cisco network device activity. Splunk analytics tied to the Salt Typhoon analytic story describe suspicious behaviors including Cisco IOS-XE tunnel interface creation with tunnel source and destination plus 10.10.12.0/24 addressing; suspicious use of "request platform software package describe" with shell-style filename patterns; WebUI programmatic configuration via the SEP_webui_wsma_http process; WebUI logins involving local port 21111 as a strong indicator of exploitation; bursts of SSH, Telnet-to-port-22, and ping activity across multiple IPs in a short window; reconnaissance command bursts such as show running-config, show tacacs, show cdp neighbors, show file systems, dir bootflash, and terminal formatting commands; Guestshell enablement followed by destruction; log-clearing sequences including show logging, clear logging, and exit; and rapid VTY access-class removal and re-application following HTTP configuration activity. These behaviors map to reconnaissance, remote services, proxying/tunneling, exploitation of public-facing applications, command execution, defense evasion, and valid-account abuse. The content also places Salt Typhoon among representative Chinese state-sponsored actors alongside APT41 and Volt Typhoon, and cites it as an example of how Chinese cyber campaigns rely on a commercial support layer of private firms, contractors, and data brokers.

Share:
Are they targeting you?

Know when an actor pivots toward your sector

Mallory correlates actor tradecraft and target patterns against your stack, your sector, and your geography. See overlap before they land.

OPERATIONAL PROFILE

Targeting

Who, where, and (when attributed) which flag flies behind the operation. Pulled from open-source reporting and Mallory's analyst review.

Who they target

Sectors the actor has been observed targeting.

  • Telecommunication Services
  • Government & Administration

Where they target

Geographies tied to known operations.

  • 🇺🇸 United States
MITRE ATT&CK

Tradecraft

67 distinct techniques observed across reporting, grouped by tactic. Hover any cell for the evidence excerpt; click through for MITRE's full description.

14 of 15 tactics95 techniques×N= number of intelligence reports citing this technique
MITRE ATT&CK
TA0043
Reconnaissance
2 techniques
T1590×2
Gather Victim Network Information
T1595
Active Scanning
TA0042
Resource Development
5 techniques
T1583
Acquire Infrastructure
T1583.005
Botnet
T1584
Compromise Infrastructure
T1584.008
Network Devices
T1587
Develop Capabilities
T1587.001
Malware
T1588
Obtain Capabilities
T1588.002
Tool
T1608
Stage Capabilities
TA0001
Initial Access
2 techniques
T1078×2
Valid Accounts
T1078.002
Domain Accounts
T1190×12
Exploit Public-Facing Application
TA0002
Execution
6 techniques
T1047
Windows Management Instrumentation
T1059×3
Command and Scripting Interpreter
T1059.001×2
PowerShell
T1059.003
Windows Command Shell
T1106
Native API
T1203
Exploitation for Client Execution
T1569
System Services
T1569.002
Service Execution
T1574
Hijack Execution Flow
T1574.001
DLL
TA0003
Persistence
4 techniques
T1078×2
Valid Accounts
T1078.002
Domain Accounts
T1505
Server Software Component
T1505.003×2
Web Shell
T1543
Create or Modify System Process
T1543.003×3
Windows Service
T1547
Boot or Logon Autostart Execution
T1547.001×2
Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder
TA0004
Privilege Escalation
5 techniques
T1055×2
Process Injection
T1055.001
Dynamic-link Library Injection
T1055.012
Process Hollowing
T1068
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation
T1078×2
Valid Accounts
T1078.002
Domain Accounts
T1543
Create or Modify System Process
T1543.003×3
Windows Service
T1547
Boot or Logon Autostart Execution
T1547.001×2
Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder
TA0005
Stealth
8 techniques
T1014
Rootkit
T1055×2
Process Injection
T1055.001
Dynamic-link Library Injection
T1055.012
Process Hollowing
T1070
Indicator Removal
T1070.001
Clear Windows Event Logs
T1078×2
Valid Accounts
T1078.002
Domain Accounts
T1140×4
Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information
T1564
Hide Artifacts
T1564.003
Hidden Window
T1574
Hijack Execution Flow
T1574.001
DLL
T1620×2
Reflective Code Loading
TA0006
Credential Access
3 techniques
T1003
OS Credential Dumping
T1003.001
LSASS Memory
T1040×3
Network Sniffing
T1056
Input Capture
T1056.001
Keylogging
TA0007
Discovery
12 techniques
T1012
Query Registry
T1016
System Network Configuration Discovery
T1018
Remote System Discovery
T1033
System Owner/User Discovery
T1040×3
Network Sniffing
T1046
Network Service Discovery
T1049
System Network Connections Discovery
T1057
Process Discovery
T1082×2
System Information Discovery
T1083
File and Directory Discovery
T1482
Domain Trust Discovery
T1518
Software Discovery
T1518.001
Security Software Discovery
TA0008
Lateral Movement
2 techniques
T1021
Remote Services
T1021.001
Remote Desktop Protocol
T1021.002
SMB/Windows Admin Shares
T1021.004
SSH
T1570
Lateral Tool Transfer
TA0009
Collection
3 techniques
T1005
Data from Local System
T1056
Input Capture
T1056.001
Keylogging
T1213×2
Data from Information Repositories
TA0011
Command and Control
8 techniques
T1008
Fallback Channels
T1071×2
Application Layer Protocol
T1071.001×3
Web Protocols
T1090
Proxy
T1095
Non-Application Layer Protocol
T1105
Ingress Tool Transfer
T1571
Non-Standard Port
T1572
Protocol Tunneling
T1573
Encrypted Channel
T1573.001
Symmetric Cryptography
TA0010
Exfiltration
1 technique
T1048
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol
TA0040
Impact
1 technique
T1489
Service Stop
WEAPONIZED

Associated vulnerabilities

24 CVEs this actor has used in observed campaigns. 24 of them exploited in the wild.

CVE-2023-20198Authentication Bypass in Cisco IOS XE Web UIIn the wildEvidence7

The Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) recently issued a high-severity alert about an ongoing cyber attack campaign exploiting a critical vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE devices, tracked as CVE-2023-20198. This vulnerability has a perfect CVSS score of 10.0, reflecting its extreme risk, and has been actively exploited since 2023.

CVE-2022-41040ProxyNotShell SSRF in Microsoft Exchange ServerIn the wildEvidence6

The process command line contained the MSExchangePowerShellAppPool argument, indicating that the attacker exploited the Exchange server via the ProxyNotShell exploit chain... ProxyNotShell (CVE-2022-41040, CVE-2022-41082) is a related exploit chain disclosed in 2022. Both allow unauthenticated attackers to execute code on unpatched Exchange servers.

CVE-2018-0171Cisco Smart Install Remote Code ExecutionIn the wildEvidence5

In 2025, it was reported that Russian government-sponsored ransomware gangs Static Tundra and Salt Typhoon exploited the CVE-2018–0171 vulnerability in unpatched Cisco equipment. The CVE-2018–0171 vulnerability in Cisco IOS and IOS XE allows a remote threat actor to execute arbitrary commands without authentication, and it was disclosed that the vulnerability was used to gain initial access.

CVE-2021-26855ProxyLogon SSRF in Microsoft Exchange ServerIn the wildEvidence4

Both groups were also early exploiters of the ProxyLogon vulnerability (CVE-2021-26855) and have used some of the same publicly available tools.

CVE-2023-20273Cisco IOS XE Web UI Post-Authentication Command Injection / Privilege EscalationIn the wildEvidence3

Salt Typhoon has exploited vulnerabilities in Cisco edge devices (notably CVE-2023-20198 and CVE-2023-20273) to gain unauthorized access to telecom networks.

19 more CVEs tied to this actor tracked in Mallory.

IOCS

Observables

159 indicators attributed to this actor: domains, IPs, hashes, and other artifacts pulled from reporting. View more in app.

IOC values are gated. View more in Mallory for domains, IPs, hashes, and other artifacts, or pipe them straight into your SIEM.

What this page doesn’t show

The version that knows your environment.

This page is what’s public. Mallory adds the parts that aren’t: sector and geo overlap with your footprint, the IOCs they’re burning right now, detection coverage, and what to do next.
Target overlap

Match sector + geo + tech-stack targeting against your real footprint.

Tradecraft mapping67

Every observed MITRE ATT&CK technique, grouped by tactic.

Malware arsenal33

Families this actor is known to deploy, with IOCs and behavior.

Exploited CVEs24

CVEs this actor has used in known campaigns.

Detection signatures

YARA, Sigma, Snort, and vendor rules, auto-deployed to your SIEM.

Observables159

Domains, IPs, and hashes tied to this actor, refreshed continuously.